We've been writing about the coming wave of "concierge" medicine for over six years, so this is nothing new to our readers:
"New data from a national survey of nearly 14,000 physicians ... found that 9.6 percent of “practice owners” were planning to convert to concierge practices in the next one to three years."
That's nearly 1 in 10 practitioners, which is pretty significant. The usual suspects are cited: low Medicare and private reimbursement rates, which are only getting worse under the ObamaTax. And the so-called "Doc Fix" continues to hang as an albatross around the future's neck.
What's even more frightening, though, is that the phenomenon seems to be specialty-independent; that is, it's not just primary care, but surgeons and oncologists and, well, the list goes on. Which makes sense: health care is (pretty much) health care, and someone has to pay for it.
Which brings us to the uptick in concierge-style medicine. Some 20 percent of docs already restrict "the number of Medicare patients in their practice and one in three primary care doctors – the providers on the front lines of keeping the cost of seniors’ care low – are restricting Medicare patients." So if you can't get into your primary care doc, good luck getting a referral to that cardio guy you need to see.
Concierge-style medicine seeks to get around that problem by having patients contract directly with the provider. Of course, this will work better for some practice areas than others, primary care being the most obvious. How - or even if - this would work with, say, surgeons or radiologists seems unclear at this point. On the other hand, it was essentially the premise (and "promise") of HMO's. On the other hand, we've seen how those have worked out over the past decades.
The biggest problem right now is the threat that HHS Secretary Shecantbeserious will pull another mandate out of her...um... pocket and render the whole point moot.
Senin, 18 Februari 2013
Langganan:
Posting Komentar (Atom)
Recent Posts
Popular Posts
-
When you rely on government your counting on someone without a vested concern for your health and well being to do what is right. Actually l...
-
According to HuffPo , "57% of Americans that lost jobs could not afford to buy health insurance". Well duh? They probably are hav...
-
So it appears that women "of a certain age" may well benefit from not one, but two shots of the good stuff: " A glass or two...
-
For those in the path of Hurricane/TS Sandy (and/or for those who may face other severe weather conditions) the Insurance Information Instit...
-
Caution: extreme wonkery ahead. Which is not to say that that there's extreme clarity ahead: after all, on what planet does this phrase...
-
Nina Kallen hosts this week's outstanding collection of risk-related posts , with a twist: she's nicknamed this edition "the...
-
■ First the bad news. From the Annals of the Much Vaunted National Health System© comes this alarming development: " Almost half of Bri...
-
HHS is spending $700 million of YOUR money to teach you something your parents did not. In an effort to save Obamacare the government is hop...
-
I've always subscribed to the conventional wisdom that emptying a full bladder as soon as (practically) possible was always the "wa...
-
Back in the day (2 months ago), I could get competitive quotes from several carriers using the application of just one. Apparently, the carr...
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar